CellOPark threatens legal action in ‘commercial dispute’ after email confusion
Parking app company CellOPark has promised to “take all steps, including legal action” to deal with confusing emails sent to customers amid what it described as a “commercial dispute”.
Motorists who park in areas where CellOPark operates – including Brisbane City Council and several Australian university campuses – received contradictory emails in the week leading up to Christmas about a planned changeover to a new app called OPark.
The first email, sent on Wednesday, December 18, told users their CellOPark accounts would be transferred to the new app.
A day later, another email was sent out, claiming the first was sent “by the local representative in breach of his obligations” and that there was no connection between the two brands.
In the latest email, on Monday, customers were told that “the court of competent jurisdiction has issued a temporary injunction prohibiting the transfer of users from CellOPark to O-Park”.
A spokesman for CellOPark Australia, trading as Smarter City Solutions, Adam Slonim, responded to the developing saga on Tuesday, saying the company was “taking all steps – including legal action – to resolve this matter quickly and effectively”.
“That email [alleging that the changeover had been cancelled] was not sent with our authorisation and, after an urgent investigation, it became clear that this email was sent as part of what is now a commercial dispute about the transition away from our overseas supplier of the CellOPark system and an attempt to derail the transition using unauthorised access to our email domain,” he said.
Company records showed that CellOPark started in Australia in 2008, with current shareholders based in Sydney, Israel and Cyprus. The existing app is understood to be based on software developed by the Israeli parking tech company Cello.