Lonely ‘problem gambler’ allowed back on casino floor

Loading
“She does not appear to have family, and she says her friends are all to be found at the casino,” he said.
“What part of the time at the casino she spends socialising with friends and what time gambling is not addressed by either party.
“Objectively speaking, on the information to hand, I find she does have difficulty limiting the amount of time spent gambling.”
Still, Howe said, he had “no reasonable grounds” to believe SB was at risk of experiencing harm from gambling. He said Star records showed her leaving the casino with her winnings on 29 days, rather than feeding them back into gambling.
Loading
“There is no evidence that another family member is affected by SB’s gambling. Indeed, there is no evidence that she has any other family members,” Howe said.
“There is no evidence that there are any friends or relatives affected, nor that any such have called or arrived at the casino to ask after her.
“The only friends mentioned have been friends she met at the casino itself … There is nothing to suggest any effect on the community.”
Howe ordered Star’s exclusion direction to be set aside, allowing SB to once again enter the casino.
“I might add, SB has been the author of much of her own difficulties in the matter at hand,” he said.
“Star was acting responsibly in asking her about her financial standing as a carer on a fortnightly benefit, but she either failed to comprehend what reasonable information was being sought or avoided providing it.
“Her full disclosure of her financial standing from the outset may well have resulted in a very different conclusion reached by Star that she was a person experiencing harm from gambling.”
Start the day with a summary of the most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.